Overview - Snapdragon 685 Vs Dimensity 9200 Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 685 vs Dimensity 9200 Plus SoCs by Qualcomm and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 685 17
Dimensity 9200 Plus 60
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 685 11
Dimensity 9200 Plus 63
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 685 79
Dimensity 9200 Plus 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 685 36
Dimensity 9200 Plus 70
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 685 Dimensity 9200 Plus
CPU 81894 290704
GPU 39122 600560
Memory 77991 254170
UX 71216 217772
Total score 270223 1363206
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 19.64% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 685 (3350 vs 2800 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 300.05% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 685 (8533 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 685 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 404.47% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 685 (1,363 K vs 270 K ).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 685.
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus Support 301.76% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 685 (68.3 vs 17 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 377
Dimensity 9200 Plus 1545

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 685 1609
Dimensity 9200 Plus 5421

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 61%

Graphics test 75 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display HD+ @ 120 Hz, FHD+ @ 120 Hz WQHD @ 144Hz, FHD+ @ 240Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 1080 × 2520 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth Up to 12-bit, Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

89%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73
    4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53
    1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache - 8 MB
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - 17 Billion
  • TDP - 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 610 Immortalis-G715 MC11
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 4
  • GPU frequency - -
  • Execution units 2 11
  • Shading units 96 -
  • FLOPS - 4736 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 8533 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 68.3 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU 690
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X11 MediaTek T800
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

CPU
17%
GPU
11%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

CPU
60%
GPU
63%
Memory
100%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote