Menu

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

Exynos 2200

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

Dimensity 9200 Plus
Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 9200 Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 9200 Plus SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 43
Dimensity 9200 Plus 60
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 43
Dimensity 9200 Plus 63
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Dimensity 9200 Plus 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 57
Dimensity 9200 Plus 70
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Dimensity 9200 Plus
CPU 223163 290704
GPU 391575 600560
Memory 175188 254170
UX 154579 217772
Total score 944505 1363206
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 19.64% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 (3350 vs 2800 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 166.66% higher memory frequency than Exynos 2200 (8533 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 44.33% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 2200 (1,363 K vs 945 K ).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus Support 33.40% higher memory bandwidth than Exynos 2200 (68.3 vs 51.2 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Dimensity 9200 Plus 1545

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Dimensity 9200 Plus 5421

3DMark

33%
Exynos 2200
Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
65%
Dimensity 9200 Plus
Stability 61%

Graphics test 75 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - WQHD @ 144Hz, FHD+ @ 240Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

89%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
     1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache - 8 MB
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - 17 Billion
  • TDP - 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Immortalis-G715 MC11
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Valhall 4
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz -
  • Execution units 24 11
  • Shading units 384 -
  • FLOPS - 4736 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 8533 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 68.3 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 690
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - MediaTek T800
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

Samsung Exynos 2200
CPU
43%
GPU
43%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
CPU
60%
GPU
63%
Memory
100%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote