Menu

78

Points
Unisoc Tiger T612

Tiger T612

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

Dimensity 9200 Plus
Overview - Tiger T612 Vs Dimensity 9200 Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Tiger T612 vs Dimensity 9200 Plus SoCs by Unisoc and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Tiger T612 14
Dimensity 9200 Plus 60
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Tiger T612 8
Dimensity 9200 Plus 63
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tiger T612 57
Dimensity 9200 Plus 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Tiger T612 26
Dimensity 9200 Plus 70
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Tiger T612 Dimensity 9200 Plus
CPU 67603 290704
GPU 22171 600560
Memory 61955 254170
UX 58129 217772
Total score 209858 1363206
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 86.11% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T612 (3350 vs 1800 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 433.31% higher memory frequency than Tiger T612 (8533 vs 1600 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Tiger T612 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 549.58% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T612 (1,363 K vs 210 K ).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Tiger T612.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Tiger T612 347
Dimensity 9200 Plus 1545

Multi-Core Score

icon
Tiger T612 1293
Dimensity 9200 Plus 5421

3DMark

2%
Tiger T612
Stability 97%

Graphics test 2 FPS
65%
Dimensity 9200 Plus
Stability 61%

Graphics test 75 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 60Hz, HD+ @ 90 Hz WQHD @ 144Hz, FHD+ @ 240Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2160 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

48%
Turbo Clock Speed

1800 MHz

89%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
     1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache - 8 MB
  • Process 12 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - 17 Billion
  • TDP - 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MP1 Immortalis-G715 MC11
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall 4
  • GPU frequency 650 MHz -
  • Execution units 1 11
  • Shading units - -
  • FLOPS - 4736 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.0 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 11 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1600 MHz 8533 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 68.3 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 32 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 690
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2160 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 50MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 1K at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - MediaTek T800
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Unisoc Tiger T612

Unisoc Tiger T612
CPU
14%
GPU
8%
Memory
19%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
CPU
60%
GPU
63%
Memory
100%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote