Overview - Snapdragon 680 Vs Dimensity 9200 Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 680 vs Dimensity 9200 Plus SoCs by Qualcomm and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 680 16
Dimensity 9200 Plus 60
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 680 10
Dimensity 9200 Plus 63
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 680 79
Dimensity 9200 Plus 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 680 35
Dimensity 9200 Plus 70
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 680 Dimensity 9200 Plus
CPU 81097 290704
GPU 38425 600560
Memory 68438 254170
UX 63600 217772
Total score 251560 1363206
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 39.58% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 680 (3350 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 300.05% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 680 (8533 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 680 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 441.90% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 680 (1,363 K vs 252 K ).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 680.
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus Support 301.76% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 680 (68.3 vs 17 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 680 368
Dimensity 9200 Plus 1545

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 680 1496
Dimensity 9200 Plus 5421

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 2 FPS
Stability 61%

Graphics test 75 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 90 Hz WQHD @ 144Hz, FHD+ @ 240Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

89%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
    4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
    1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache - 8 MB
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - 17 Billion
  • TDP - 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 610 Immortalis-G715 MC11
  • Architecture Adreno 610 Valhall 4
  • GPU frequency 1114 MHz -
  • Execution units 2 11
  • Shading units 96 -
  • FLOPS - 4736 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 8533 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 68.3 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU 690
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X11 MediaTek T800
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

CPU
16%
GPU
10%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

CPU
60%
GPU
63%
Memory
100%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote